London Web Factory

Hosting Performance and SEO: A Real-World AWS Migration Case Study

Can changing hosting provider improve SEO? This real-world case study compares response times before and after migrating from a dedicated server to AWS and explores how hosting performance influences Core Web Vitals, page speed and user experience.

Website owners often ask whether changing hosting providers can improve SEO.

The answer is not as simple as choosing one hosting company over another. However, hosting performance can have a significant impact on user experience, Core Web Vitals and ultimately search visibility.

Several years ago, a website was migrated from a 1&1 (now IONOS) dedicated server to an Amazon Web Services (AWS) EC2 instance. The results were surprising and provide an interesting case study in how hosting performance can influence website speed.

Why Hosting Matters

When a visitor accesses a website, the web server must process the request and return the page as quickly as possible.

If the server is slow to respond, visitors experience delays before content begins loading. Search engines may also detect poor performance through metrics such as:

  • Time to First Byte (TTFB)
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
  • Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
  • Core Web Vitals
  • Overall page experience

While Google has repeatedly stated that content quality remains far more important than hosting choice, a slow server can create a poor user experience that ultimately affects conversions, engagement and rankings.

The Migration

The website in this case study was moved from a 1&1 L2 Dedicated Server to an Amazon EC2 t2.medium instance.

Response times were monitored before and after the migration.

Response Time Comparison

Metric 1&1 L2 Dedicated Server Amazon EC2 t2.medium
Average Response Time ~1.4 seconds ~0.5 seconds
Maximum Response Time Observed 1.426 seconds ~0.5 seconds
Performance Variation Moderate fluctuations Relatively stable
Uptime During Test 100% 100%
Relative Performance Baseline Approximately 65% faster

The improvement was immediate. Average response times fell from approximately 1.4 seconds to around 0.5 seconds.

Although the hardware specifications appeared broadly comparable, the AWS environment delivered substantially lower response times and more consistent performance.

Does Faster Hosting Improve Rankings?

Not directly.

Google does not rank websites based on whether they use AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, IONOS, SiteGround or any other hosting provider.

What Google does care about is the experience users receive when visiting a website.

A faster server can contribute to:

  • Faster page loading times
  • Improved Core Web Vitals scores
  • Better user engagement
  • Lower bounce rates
  • Higher conversion rates

These factors can indirectly contribute to improved search performance.

Hosting Has Changed Since This Test

It is important to remember that this comparison was originally carried out several years ago.

Today's hosting landscape looks very different.

Modern hosting platforms commonly include:

  • Content Delivery Networks (CDNs)
  • Edge caching
  • HTTP/3
  • NVMe storage
  • Object caching
  • Cloud-based auto-scaling
  • Global load balancing

Many traditional hosting providers now offer performance levels that would have been difficult to achieve when this original test was conducted.

For this reason, the lesson is not that AWS is always faster than IONOS or any other provider.

The real lesson is that infrastructure matters.

The Bigger SEO Picture

When conducting SEO audits, server performance remains one of the areas worth investigating.

However, it is rarely the largest problem.

In many cases, websites are slowed down by:

  • Poorly optimised images
  • Excessive JavaScript
  • Bloated WordPress themes
  • Too many plugins
  • Inefficient database queries
  • Lack of caching

Moving to a faster server while ignoring these issues may provide only limited benefits.

The best results usually come from addressing both infrastructure and website optimisation together.

What Should You Measure?

Before considering a hosting migration, measure:

  • Core Web Vitals
  • Time to First Byte (TTFB)
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
  • Server response times
  • Database performance
  • Page load speed under real-world conditions

Tools such as Google PageSpeed Insights, Lighthouse and WebPageTest can provide valuable insights into whether hosting performance is becoming a bottleneck.

Final Thoughts

This migration demonstrated that hosting infrastructure can make a significant difference to website performance. In this particular case, average response times improved by approximately 65% after moving from a dedicated server to AWS.

However, the key takeaway for 2026 is not that one hosting provider is inherently better than another.

Instead, businesses should focus on delivering the fastest and most reliable user experience possible. Modern SEO is increasingly influenced by page experience, Core Web Vitals and user satisfaction, all of which can benefit from a well-optimised hosting environment.

The hosting company matters far less than the performance your visitors actually experience.

Useful Links